Received : 10/27/07 |
Estimates of size and distance - 1 |
Roger PAQUAY |
|
|
|
According to your web site, when the craft turned and moved in the direction of the witnesses, it was at a distance of 1 km (0.62 mile or 3,280 feet), a distance that can be measured on the scaled map.... read more |
|
|
Received : 04/20/08 |
Helicopter noise - 1 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
In this case, an Army officer, Lt. Col. AMOND [now retired], and his wife, stopped their car on what Wim [VAN UTRECHT] describes as a "lonely road" and wound down the window with "ears pricked" to try and detect any sound from an object of evidently large angular size showing details of lit "panels" or windows as well as various other separate lights which circled apparently nearby for up to 8 minutes..... read more |
|
|
Received : 05/13/08 |
Helicopter noise - 2 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
It is correct that an inversion will refract sound towards the surface, and the recommendation to avoid flying in an inversion makes sense therefore. But the inference that flying above the top of an inversion will have the inverse effect of abnormally refracting sound upward is unwarranted I think..... read more |
|
|
Received : 05/17/08 |
Helicopter noise - 3 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
Re the Ernage case in particular and silent helicopters in general, I looked a bit further into the sound propagation question and helicopter noise sources. Perhaps this will help us decide the merits of the theory. Anyway I've collected some information for future reference - and just because it's interesting..... read more |
|
|
Received : 05/26/08 |
Estimates of size and distance - 2 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
I'd like to point out that Mr. PAQUAY treats Lt. Col. AMOND's "2x moon diameter" light as relating to the angular size of a light source, when clearly this should be treated as an impression of the circle of glare (overloaded retina) caused by this "huge" and "brilliant" light shining into the witness's face...... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/05/08 |
A response from the prime witness |
André AMOND, Col. (Ret.) |
|
|
|
I would like to correct the approach of Mr. PAQUAY who claims that the observation of the "spotlight" was made while the craft was 1,000 m from my observation point. This is COMPLETELY WRONG....... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/17/08 |
Estimates of size and distance - 3 |
Roger PAQUAY |
|
|
|
In his response, dated June 5, 2008, Col. AMOND claims that my distance estimation of 1,000 m for the phase during which the craft turned towards him is completely false and that the real distance at that moment was 100 to 200 m. He also disputes my calculations and qualifies them as unscientific....... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/22/08 |
Not a helicopter - 1 |
Wilfried DE BROUWER, Maj. Gen. (Ret.) |
|
|
|
The Belgian airspace is surveyed by four powerful radars, two military and two civilian, which are all interlinked, i.e. any duty controller can select the image of any of these radars at any one time. All radar registrations are recorded and these recordings are kept during a well determined period...... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/23/08 |
Witness reliability - 1 |
Jean-Michel ABRASSART |
|
|
|
A little comment about the strawman argument at the end of Wilfried DE BROUWER's email...... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/23/08 |
Witness reliability - 2 |
Grégory GUTIEREZ |
|
|
|
In my opinion, the important information in DE BROUWER's e-mail is not in his last paragraph about the reliability of Col. AMOND. Of course human testimony is not always reliable, but Jean-Michel ABRASSART tends to say that it's NEVER reliable. I think he pushes his argument too far here, turning it into some kind of indisputable doctrine..... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/23/08 |
Plasma stealth chopper - 1 |
Jean-Pierre PHARABOD |
|
|
|
Now I am beginning to wonder : how could it be that the four Belgian radars did not detect these objects in the sky which were neither aircraft nor helicopters... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/23/08 |
Not a helicopter - 2 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
Gen. DE BROUWER's first-hand testimony confirms not only that no helicopter should have been flying (as previously reported by Col. AMOND) but that, in point of fact, no illicit helicopter or other aircraft was detected by radars covering the area.... read more |
|
|
Received : 06/26/08 |
Plasma stealth chopper - 2 / Map confusion |
Prof. Auguste MEESSEN |
|
|
|
I will try to contribute to this debate by sharing with you that I have the following documents concerning the Ernage case.... read more |
|
|
Received : 07/02/08 |
Recapitulating |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
Re your reply to Prof. MEESSEN, you're right, the statement about flight plans in the Defence Minister's reply to the Parliamentary question is different from what we understood Gen. DE BROUWER to say.... read more |
|
|
Received : 07/03/08 |
Estimates of size and distance - 4 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
Thanks for Mr. PAQUAY's follow-up. I was not (as Mr. PAQUAY believes) suggesting that Col. AMOND was "dazzled" to explain a large image. As he says, an "overloaded retina" is not a very good explanation.... read more |
|
|
Received : 07/06/08 |
Not a helicopter - 3 |
Wilfried DE BROUWER, Maj. Gen. (Ret.) |
|
|
|
Allow me to clarify a few points.
1. Your statement: "A helicopter is perfectly capable of executing such a manoeuvre".
The report of André AMOND suggests that the object was making a tight turn with a considerable angle of bank (45 degrees?) at very slow speed (20-30 km/h?).... read more |
|
|
Received : 07/14/08 |
Helicopters noise - 4 / Banking angles - 1 |
Joe McGONAGLE |
|
|
|
I don't claim to have the detailed aeronautical experience of General DE BROUWER, but during my own military service, I did have some exposure to helicopters as a passenger and as an observer from the ground..... read more |
|
|
Received : 07/14/08 |
Helicopters noise - 5 / Banking angles - 2 |
Martin SHOUGH |
|
|
|
Thanks for your input Joe. Yes, clearly it can happen that when the conditions for sound propagation and other witness circumstances are unfavourable people can fail to hear helicopters...... read more |
|
|
|
See our contact page to find out how you too can contribute. |
|
|